« In Moorhead, Antagonizing Young Minds | Main | Why American Cars Annoy Me »

Freud: The Future of an Illusion

I recently completed reading Freud's The Future of an Illusion, which is essentially a diatribe against religion in society, on the premise that we've evolved beyond the point of needing it. He makes some interesting points, such as that rules that frame civilization should be couched in a context of bettering society, not based on a religious epithet. Nonetheless, his own self-arguments in the book (he plays devil's advocate with himself) end up being as dissuasive of his point of view as anything. Ultimately, I think the question is from whence we derive our concept of "good for society"? It needs to be based on some sense of right and wrong. Anyway...

He also accuses himself of essentially positing an alternative belief system (religion) when he's advocating to remove religion. This is somewhat true, depending on when "philosophy" becomes "religion."

What I did take away from this book, however, is something I learned from Stumbling on Happiness -- which is that the brain's ability to look into the future is not very reliable. We really need to become presentists as much as possible. This does not mean we shouldn't plan for future events (catastrophes, retirement, etc.) - this distinguishes us from the monkeys. But, rather, we need to value current information as being more accurate than projected, predicted information, because ultimately that information may be misleading.

I also learned from this book that the Founding Fathers were correct in writing 'separation of church and state' into the Constitution. Our laws, which buttress civilization, should be focused on the betterment of society. There should not be overt religious interplay in the legislative process. At the same time, the legislative process should not interfere with peoples' abilities to subscribe to and practice a given religion.

I had hoped to learn something here that would apply to infosec. No such luck, per se, other than reinforcing that we need to find a way to speak to the instinctual side of people when describing threats. Though we'd like to believe that the average man can evolve to be the intellectual man, that day has not yet arrived. Thus, we need to describe things in the primitive language. fwiw.



TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.secureconsulting.net/MT/mt-tb.cgi/270

Post a comment

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on March 17, 2007 7:33 PM.

The previous post in this blog was In Moorhead, Antagonizing Young Minds.

The next post in this blog is Why American Cars Annoy Me.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.